,

Yamaha XV1100 Virago test ride

by

โ€“

Take a look at one of Japanโ€™s first, purpose-built, metric chop/cruisers: the Yamaha XV Virago family was mighty popular in its time, and the XV1100 Virago was the daddy of them all and people loved โ€™em.

WORDS: Steve Cooper
PICS: Gary Chapman

Someone wrote to editor Bertie a fair while ago and asked when we were going to throw some aged limbs across Japanese factory custom bikes โ€“ so in response, here we are.


Enjoy more Classic Motorcycle Mechanics Magazine reading every month.
Click here to subscribe & save.

At the time of this photo shoot, itโ€™s the height of the British summer (Bertie doesnโ€™t allow riding peopleโ€™s pride and joys in winter) and yet (as you might reasonably expect) Mother Nature has thrown all four seasons into one day.

 It may be hot right now but there are some heavy clouds amassing, which isnโ€™t necessarily the weather of choice for riding a machine thatโ€™s going to take a lot of cleaning if it gets dirty. Fortunately, owner Ron doesnโ€™t seem too concerned and Gary โ€˜the Lensโ€™ Chapman is delighted with the moody backdrop afforded by the potentially mardy sky. In fact, if you closed one eye and put a patch on the other, our static shots could almost be in Americaโ€™s midwest where big cruisers come into their own. However, weโ€™re in Norfolk so letโ€™s get down to business. A walk around the bike confirms the XV1100 is very much a ground-up design and not some hastily reheated dish or a repurposed roadster. What we have here is a prima facie example of a Japanese metric cruiser whose sole purpose was to take sales away from Harley-Davidson in the key American market. The two cylinders are in line with the frame further reinforcing the H-D analogy. That top-end does seem to be vaguely familiar โ€“ and then the penny drops… thereโ€™s more than a hint of XT/ SR500 about it. I wonder if there are any familial links here?

It wouldnโ€™t have been too difficult for XVโ€™s designers to have blinged up the bike to the nines but the styling guys back at Iwata opted not to go OTT. Yes, thereโ€™s a lot of chrome to the bike but itโ€™s not excessive so no dazzling mudguards or faux tank panels, just deep, lustrous maroon paintwork. Okay, so thereโ€™s shiny stuff on the power unit youโ€™d not have on a roadster but again, in my eye at least, itโ€™s not unwarranted. Initially the wheels look a little odd until you realise that theyโ€™re built arse-about-face. The spokes have their angled heads through a special flange on the rim with their threaded ends inside protrusions on the hubs that run at 90 degrees from them; and when you look a little deeper the nipples have hex-heads in their tops. All a little odd perhaps but there must be a good reason for this set up which Iโ€™m guessing has to do with the use of tubeless tyres.

As you might reasonably expect, the riderโ€™s eye view is a little different from the norm with a purpose-made dash that features an early generation LCD display advising which gear has been selected (a common add-on in the 1990s). The white-faced gauges bring a touch of restrained glamour to the cockpit without looking gauche. Out towards the ends of those obligatory cow-horn handlebars are two sets of switch gear that are light years away from Yamahaโ€™s 1970s offerings, yet still retain both logical functionality and ease of access; to use that hackneyed phrase โ€ฆall controls fell readily to hand. Which also includes the choke actuator so no scrabbling around the lower reaches of the tank for some silly little lever thatโ€™s never quite where you think it should be.

The big XV fires up at the touch of the button and, once warm, settles into a reassuring rhythm. It really doesnโ€™t matter where a V-twin comes from โ€“ there really is nothing like the feel and sound of a pair of angled pots. Both when static and at speed the 46 / classic motorcycle mechanics exhaust note is muted โ€“ obviously Yamaha were ensuring the bike met the then current noise regulations and yet they still managed to engineer some soul into the machine.

In contrast to the short muffler the headers are happy to emit something of a bark. Perhaps it was intended for the rider to hear the living, breathing, soul of the motor but not the public in general? Regardless of the reasons why, the bike definitely isnโ€™t totally sanitised, thankfully. The XV needs some revs to pull away from rest which, again, differentiates it from the Milwaukee offerings. The H-Ds tend to have big, heavy flywheels that aid initial drive but also exacerbate vibrations as the revs build โ€“ simply put, you canโ€™t have it both ways.

Out on the road the V-twin doesnโ€™t feel one iota like its American inspiration; the motor is pretty much vibration-free and relatively flexible. Okay, so it may not have the supposed zero-revs-gut wrenching torque of a Milwaukee motor but it doesnโ€™t have the Yank motorโ€™s foibles and vibes either. So far unmentioned, but yet another key selling point of the Yamaha, is the shaft-drive which is totally unobtrusive and never, during our road test, made its presence felt. A chain would have been an easier and cheaper option and, yes, power is lost via the bevel boxes at both ends of the shaft, but it really doesnโ€™t matter on a cruiser at all surely? And this begs the question as to why contemporary Beemers were so sensitive to badly timed downward changes? Possibly itโ€™s the latterโ€™s engine speed clutch but regardless, the XV never has its rear tyre hopping.

Obligatory on a proper cruiser are the forward foot-rests and King & Queen seat. Even if the foot controls look like theyโ€™ll be difficult to operate the reality is the opposite โ€“ they become instinctive in minutes. Many K&Q seats are literally a royal pain in the backside, but not this one. The front of the rear perch seems to stop the back of the riderโ€™s seat from being squashed too much and, for me at least, the ergonomics of the Virago proved to be surprisingly comfortable.

Thereโ€™s an expectation or belief that factory custom bikes donโ€™t handle โ€“ the XV1100 is very happy to contradict both assumptions… within the constraints of its design, of course. The big twin handles much better than you might expect and Iโ€™d go so far as to say itโ€™s genuinely an easy machine to ride once you realise weโ€™re not talking race-rep steering geometries.

Much of its easy-going nature is probably due to where the bulk of the weight is located. This would appear to be low down so thereโ€™s no tendency to suddenly drop into bends because of a high C of G. Ground clearance may be compromised by the low-slung motor and pegs but thatโ€™s all part of the metric cruiser image. The frame utilises the engine as a partially stressed member and on the left thereโ€™s a chromed rail that weaves its way around the front of the sump and then on to the front edge of the opposite side; presumably this is to dial in some additional stiffness. And, doubtless, the engine protection bars further reinforce the chassis.

Comfort on pretty much any motorcycle depends upon both its ergonomics and the riderโ€™s physiology which is one reason why two people can come away from the same machine with utterly disparate opinions. For me the Virago seemed to suit these old bones rather well. Unlike some more radical custom machines I really didnโ€™t feel my weight was focussed on my tail bone and because of this I genuinely reckon I could pilot the big V-twin long distances. Now factor in the aftermarket screen taking a fair amount of the wind off the rider and it makes the bike and an even more attractive package โ€“ provided factory cruisers are โ€˜your thingโ€™, of course.

Iโ€™ve gone on record before in CMM stating that regardless of popular opinion if the aesthetics of a bike donโ€™t work for me, I generally struggle to bond with said machine. In the case of the XV1100 Iโ€™ll happily admit that my self-confessed arty-farty predilections were, initially, neutral at best.

However, once we got a few miles under our collective belt the bikeโ€™s easy-going nature rather won me over, but why? Quite simply because itโ€™s unerringly beguiling and I can genuinely see the appeal here.

The bike is easy to ride and doesnโ€™t ask the pilot to make any concessions for its so-called foibles and the like. If character equates to limb-numbing vibrations, apologies for brakes, or compromised ergonomics, Iโ€™ll gladly pass thank you. Some might argue our test machine is little more than a heavily sanitised cruiser. Iโ€™d strongly counter that the XV1100 is just another example of refined Japanese engineering and one Iโ€™d be more than happy to repeat the experience on again.

The ownerโ€™s view by Ron Steiger

I bought the XV1100 as a late 60th birthday present to myself. Turning 60, I had a 1980 Honda CB900 that I had owned for six years. My wife wasnโ€™t too keen on the Honda as the seat height was quite high and it took a huge effort by her to get on it.

Having slipped while attempting to get on and falling backwards she dislocated her left wrist, fracturing it in three places. Obviously after several weeks in a plaster cast plus weeks of physiotherapy, she was not in any hurry to get back on the bike. So, we went window shopping for something with easier access.

Having spotted the 1996 Yamaha XV1100 Virago I was impressed at how smart it looked and we both said yes! Sitting on the Virago, she was in heaven. She could get on and off without even having to step on the left rear foot-peg and hoik herself up on it. Because the seat height was so low, she literally just stepped over the bike seat and settled on it. When I first got on it, I had a hard time finding the foot-pegs as this was the first time Iโ€™d ridden a bike with forward foot controls. After a couple of attempts with my feet looking for phantom pegs it all came together.

Iโ€™ve never known a first gear so fast on a cruiser; most people refer to them as a crawling gear but not in this case. Then change up until youโ€™re in top, and youโ€™re at a decent speed. If you want to overtake or go uphill, thereโ€™s no need to change down, just open the throttle and off she goes! And thereโ€™s a lovely, thunder sound coming from the engine. The only downside is cornering. With a 19-inch front wheel and a 15-inch rear wheel, and a long wheelbase, it doesnโ€™t lend itself to being the scratcher or suited to knee-down cornering. But what it does do is glide around bends and after slowing you can negotiate tighter bends. I wouldnโ€™t trade it for anything, I love the ride and the looks it gets when I park it up โ€“ worth every penny.

Specification

ENGINE TYPE 1063cc, air-cooled, four-stroke, V-twin, SOHC BORE AND STROKE 95 x 75mm CLAIMED HORSEPOWER 61.7bhp @ 6000rpm MAXIMUM TORQUE 58ft/lb @ 6000rpm TRANSMISSION TYPE 5 speed COMPRESSION RATIO 8.3:1 CARBURETION 2 x BST40 Mikuni TYRES 110/90 x 19 (F) 140/90 x 15 (R) FUEL CAPACITY 3.7 gallons (16.8 litres) BRAKES 2 x 2282mm disc (F), SLS drum (R) WET WEIGHT 241kg (531lb)

Enjoy more Classic Motorcycle Mechanics Magazine reading every month. Click here to subscribe.


About the Author